Husband and wife being distant in same room

Domestic violence often plays role in divorce

Domestic Violence - fist on surface with textOne-in-four women and one-in-seven men will become victims of severe violence during their lifetimes.

Every minute 20 people become victims of intimate partner violence, according to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

The statistics are staggering and all too familiar, particularly in cases involving divorce where emotions run high.

Such was the case in the marriage of Robert and Sarah Ardis that recently came before the First District Court of Appeal . Robert Ardis appealed a lower court order that found him in indirect criminal contempt arising from allegations that he violated a 2009 protection against domestic violence that resulted in a 30-day jail sentence.

The case went as follows:

Toward the end of the couple’s marriage in 2009, Sarah Ardis asked for and received court-ordered domestic violence protection from her husband. Among other things, the order limited Mr. Ardis’ communications with his ex to “civil and courteous contact” to discuss issues involving their children. The couple was to comply with the order until their divorce was finalized in court.

However, a couple of months later, Sarah Ardis filed petitions in February and May 2010 alleging that her ex had violated the domestic violence order by parking too close to her car at the college where he worked, and that she attended, and that he had come within 500 feet of her home.

Unfortunately, the petitions remained dormant for more than two years with no action. In October 2012, the court entered a final order on the dissolution of their marriage.

A few months after the divorce was finalized, Sarah Ardis filled yet another petition alleging that her ex had again violated the domestic violence order by sending abusive and insulting texts to her.

In March 2013, the court issued an order to show cause relating to, not only that petition, but also to the other two that had been filed in 2010. However, the state attorney said it would only pursue the charges relating to the 2013 incidents and the court dismissed the 2010 claims.

Several months later, the state decided to move ahead and prosecute Mr. Ardis under all three petitions. The court then found him guilty of willful violations of the domestic violence order – one stemming from the February 2010 incident and the other from the more recent January 2013. He was sentenced to 30 days in jail.

Mr. Ardis argued that (a) the judgment was based partly on charges that had previously been dismissed and (b) the 2013 charges should be reversed because his texts to his ex-wife happened after they were divorced and that the previous domestic violence order stated it would stand until an order was entered in their Dissolution of Marriage action. In other words, once the divorce was finalized the domestic violence order would lapse.

The state agreed that the trial court should not have based part of its ruling on allegations from the 2010 claim of domestic violence because that petition had been dismissed. However, it urged the appellate court to affirm the judgment and the 30-day sentence for the 2013 petition.

The appellate court disagreed: “We cannot agree to affirm based on the 2013 petition because those contempt charges were based on a (domestic violence) order that had lapsed,” the court wrote. “Because the DV order at issue here did not clearly require continued compliance with its courteous conduct provision after the court entered the DOM order, we can not affirm the criminal contempt judgment and sentence entered based upon willful violation of that order.”

Unfortunately, as appears to be in this case, the justice system doesn’t always work as expeditiously as we would like. Sarah Ardis’ 2010 domestic violence claim lay dormant for two years. It’s unclear, from the appellate court ruling why this occurred.

If you are the victim of domestic violence it’s imperative that you contact qualified counsel immediately to determine your rights and to ensure that you are protected.

Lori Barkus is a Florida Supreme Court Certified Circuit Civil and Family Law mediator and guardian ad litem. She handles matters relating to divorce, custody, child support, paternity, collaborative divorce, adoption, parental rights, and family law and civil mediation

Ms. Barkus is a cum laude graduate of the University of Miami School of Law. She is admitted to practice in Florida, Georgia and the District of Columbia, as well as in the Southern and Middle Districts of Florida and the Eleventh Judicial Circuit Court of Appeals. She is also a member of Leading Women for Shared Parenting.

If you are interested in a consultation or have questions do not hesitate to contact Sustainable Family Solutions. Simply click here and send us a message and we will get right back to you.

I may need a divorce.
Hi, I’m Lori Barkus, a family law attorney. My Colorado and Florida-based law firm helps women have a successful divorce by achieving the fairest resolution in the most efficient manner possible. And today, I’d like to talk to you about the what-ifs of divorce. Let’s say you’re thinking about divorce, or maybe your spouse has shared some shocking and devastating news about a betrayal or told you that they’re thinking about divorce, and you’re completely caught off guard by this. You’re still determining what you want at this point. You might still be thinking, maybe I can still save my marriage, or it might be unavoidable and the process is moving forward. Your friends and family are telling you that you should go forward. They’re telling you, you should talk to an attorney. You have so much going on. You know you need help but you’re trying to figure out where to go.

We can help with this situation, because it’s something that my firm and I have faced many times over the years. In fact, we’ve seen cases like this so often that we’ve created an offering specifically for you. We do what’s called a strategy session, and the purpose of this session is to answer all of those what-ifs? We’re here to help you, not just tell you that you should go forward with divorce. We want you to understand what would happen if this goes forward. We want you to know what the process looks like. We want to answer your question about mediation. What is it? Is it right for you? What can you expect in terms of custody of your kids? Would you get alimony? Would you pay alimony? How does child support work? What if you want to keep your house? Maybe you’re concerned that your partner is hiding money.

We can answer all of these questions and more. We can also provide resources to help you understand your financial picture and help support you in making the decision. That’s what we’re here to do. We want you to determine if the marriage can be saved and if divorce is the right step for you, and if it is, we want to make your divorce a successful one. If you have any questions, please get in touch.
Divorce FAQs

A divorce mediator is a neutral party who does not represent either person in a divorce. They can help you and your spouse reach an agreement on all divorce-related issues such as child support, parenting plans, dividing property and spousal support. Divorce mediation usually works best when both parties generally agree on how they want to resolve the various issues and are on amicable terms. At Barkus law, we provide a service that includes both mediation time to discuss and work out the details of your divorce as well as the preparation of all divorce-related documents you will need to file with the court. Although she is a family law attorney, in her role as a mediator, Lori Barkus cannot file paperwork on your behalf, nor can she provide you with legal advice. However, she can prepare all of the documents for you and give you detailed step-by-step instructions about how to file your paperwork. Should you have legal questions or require that paperwork filed on your behalf, you should speak with a qualified attorney about your rights and obligations before and even during the mediation process. Mediation is a low-cost and less stressful way to “untie the knot.” Sustainable Family Solutions offers a flat fee for the mediation process and an additional fee for preparing the documents you need to file with the court. Please call us for details.

In a collaborative divorce, both parties are represented by separate attorneys. The parties and their lawyers sign an agreement not to go to court and instead work together to create an agreement that is best for the parties and their children. The parties can end the process if it does not work, but, if they go to court to have a judge decide, they will each need to hire another lawyer. This keeps the lawyers and parties invested in reaching an agreement. Collaborative divorce can cost far less than a traditional or litigated divorce and can help preserve the family and keep children out of the process. If you are interested in a consultation or have questions, do not hesitate to contact Sustainable Family Solutions. Simply click here and send us a message and we’ll get right back to you.

In order to obtain a divorce, one party needs to state that he or she has lived in Florida for six months and that the marriage is irretrievably broken.
A divorce can be granted over one party’s objection. As long as one party meets residency requirements and states that the marriage is irretrievably broken, there is no way to object to or to stop the divorce process from moving forward.

While you are not required to have a lawyer represent you, not having a lawyer can put you at a disadvantage. It is very important that you understand your rights and obligations before you reach any settlement or go to court. You may decide to seek legal advice or representation if you have questions about your rights in the divorce process.

While alimony can be modified, requesting a modification doesn’t mean you’ll get one. It’s not a matter of simply going before a judge and telling them that you no longer can pay what you have been paying your ex-spouse. These cases must be prepared carefully and those seeking a modification must be able to state a legal basis for the change. Under Florida statute 61.13, the trial court judge has the discretion as to whether alimony will be modified. It provides that when “the circumstances or the financial ability of either party changes” either party may apply for an order decreasing or increasing the amount of alimony and the court has jurisdiction to make orders as equity requires, with “due regard to the changed circumstances of the financial ability of the parties.” The party seeking the modification carries the burden to justify the reduction by having to prove a substantial change in circumstances since the original alimony order and that the change in circumstances was not contemplated at the time of the final order of dissolution. The change also has to be “sufficient, material, involuntary and permanent in nature.” In other words, the party seeking a reduction can’t quit a job that paid them $100,000 a year and accept a job that pays significantly less. When it comes to being permanent in nature, this depends on the facts and circumstances of a particular case. Should the spouse paying alimony choose to retire, the court can take that into consideration. However, that doesn’t mean there will be an automatic reduction or termination of alimony. The court has to consider the age of the payor, his or her health, and the reason for their decision to retire as well as the financial circumstances of the recipient. There are many scenarios that can be contemplated when seeking modification of alimony. Modifications require the consultation and assistance of an attorney who understands the process, the risks and the likelihood of success. If you are interested in a consultation or have questions do not hesitate to contact Sustainable Family Solutions. Simply click here and send us a message and we will get right back to you.

The goal of shared parenting is for parents to collaborate and to remain actively involved in their child’s life, not just on weekends or holidays. In most cases, parents share parental responsibility and make decisions together regarding education, health, and other important matters. Timesharing refers to the time each parent is allowed to spend with the child or children. In more and more cases, parents have equal or nearly equal timesharing with the children. Historically, most children whose parents divorce have spent a majority of their time living with one parent — usually the mother — with the other parent getting visitation rights. However, there has been a big push in recent years to balance the amount of time children spend with both parents, giving parents the opportunity to be actively involved in the raising of their children. In most states, including Florida, judges make custody decisions based on a”best interest of the child” standard. However, judges need not explain the reason(s) for their decisions. Several states have gone so far as to pass shared parenting legislation. In 2013, Florida lawmakers approved an alimony reform law that included a provision for shared parenting. However, Gov. Rick Scott vetoed the bill. Equal timesharing isn’t for everyone and works best for those who are ready, willing and able to take on responsibilities for their child. If you are interested in a consultation or have questions do not hesitate to contact Sustainable Family Solutions. Simply click here and send us a message and we will get right back to you.

right arrowReady to learn more? Next Steps.

Related Articles

What is involved in a Divorce Consultation?

https://youtu.be/8VLF9fivEl4 Let’s talk about what a divorce consultation is. It is your chance to understand your rights and responsibilities in...

Read More

Can alimony be modified?

While alimony can be modified, just because you request a modification it doesn’t mean you will get one. It is...

Read More

What is collaborative divorce?

In a collaborative divorce, both parties are represented by separate attorneys. The parties, and their lawyers, sign an agreement not...

Read More